Guide to Fine-tuning Claude 3.5 Sonnet

To fine-tune a pre-trained LLM model is to customize it to perform specific tasks and produce outputs tailored to our objectives by training it further on a smaller, task-specific dataset. Fine-tuning allows the prevention of redundancies associated with training a model from scratch by leveraging the general knowledge already embedded in the model. It improves performance, allows for a domain and task-specific adaptation, and allows one to build a custom branding and voice. 

One can fine-tune a model in many ways based on their needs and requirements:

1. Full fine-tuning: where all the parameters of a pre-trained model are updated and customized using task-specific data.
2. Partial fine-tuning: where only specific components of the model are trained to increase efficiency with methods including Adaptive Layers and LoRA.
3. Prompt engineering: where well-crafted prompts are used to guide a model’s output
4. Few-shot: where there’s a complete reliance on pre-trained knowledge of the model but new examples are provided
5. RLHF: where human-labeled preferences are provided to align outputs with desired qualities.

‍

Fine-tuning Claude Sonnet 3.5

A general purpose model like Claude Sonnet 3.5 especially requires fine-tuning using prompt engineering to improve its performance in niche applications. The process involves adjusting model parameters and providing data or examples to aid instructions. For something like Claude where direct fine-tuning is not possible, the process involves strategies like prompt engineering, few-shot learning, etc.

‍

Defining Objectives

We start with defining the objectives we want to achieve with the fine-tuned Claude model. For that we identify the specific tasks we want Claude to perform. For instance, we might want Claude to be able to identify the tone of the text provided based on the context. So a clear objective would involve the expectations for it to meet and tasks to perform: “I have just started to learn English, and I often struggle with identifying the tone of the characters of a book I am reading. I need you to be able to identify and describe the tone and emotions from the excerpt provided.” But just getting Claude to know what it needs to do is not enough. Much like us, it learns from examples.

‍

Providing Inputs

After the objectives are defined, provide high quality examples that align with the desired output. The more the examples and the better the quality, the better its performance. It is crucial to pre-process the data to ensure the lack of irrelevant information or errors. Moreover, building a middleware (a template between the user and Claude might help refine outputs since they allow for a standardized pre-processing of inputs and post-processing of outputs. 

‍

Here’s an example for high-quality data: 

Excerpt:

“A fingering slave, 

One that would peep and botanize 

Upon his mother's grave?”

Tone: 

Scornful and Disapproving

‍

Excerpt:

“A reasoning self-sufficing thing, 

An intellectual All-in-all!”

Tone:

Sarcastic and Condemnatory

‍

Excerpt:

“Sweet is the lore which Nature brings;”

Tone:

Appreciative and Gentle

‍

Excerpt:

“Our meddling intellect

Misshapes the beauteous forms of things:”

Tone:

Regretful and Accusatory

‍

Excerpt: 

“We murder to dissect.”

Tone:

Harsh and Condemning

‍

The model can be instructed to read all the excerpts together and analyze them for context and then start labeling each excerpt for its tone.

Providing a middleware structure helps in such a standardized formatting of input, making it easier for the model to make sense of it. Moreover, it is important to keep sessions logically connected by providing relevant prior context. A model learns quite similar to how a person does: just feeding data without any context won’t help much. 

‍

Evaluating and Iterating

Once done, evaluate the fine-tuned model by testing it with different inputs. Generally, defining parameters for the purpose of evaluation helps. For instance: number of excerpts labeled, number of excerpts correctly labeled (determine accuracy), amount of time taken, etc. Properly analyze the outputs and gather feedback on performance. Accordingly, adjust the prompts and examples provided. Only after repeated evaluations and iterations will the model reach perfection in terms of realizing the defined objectives.

‍